Spiritual Decision Making: Good and Right

Continuing on with thoughts on spiritual decision making…

In my first post, I discussed my conviction that God doesn’t give us detailed instructions on how to live every aspect of our lives – despite the fact that lots of people seem to look for that kind of specific guidance.

In my second post, I discussed the idea that it honors God when we acknowledge our preferences, and allow him to overrule.  On the back end of that, I suggested that our preference doesn’t necessarily drag us away from the will of God.  I want to expand on that in this post.

As I’ve mentioned before, there is this prevalent idea that there is one, and only one, perfect option in any decision that has to be made.  This choice is the will of God – it is right, and all others are wrong. Again, I don’t think this is a correct way of thinking.

Consider Paul’s decision-making process in Philippians 1:19-26… he is not deciding between two options only one of which is right, but between two options that are both acceptable to God.  Notice that one option, to depart and be with Christ, is “better by far”, but that’s not the option Paul chooses.  I reason that if there is only one “right” option in any choice, then Paul made a mistake by not choosing the “better by far” option.  But since he didn’t choose this, I have to conclude that the other option, to remain, was morally acceptable as well.

So if Paul could face a choice wherein both options were morally acceptable, may we not do so as well?  Must we be locked into a mode of thinking that insists on there being only one “right” choice?

Hmmm... Lots of doors here...

I believe that often we are faced with choices in which the options are morally neutral – neither right or wrong in an absolute sense.  When faced with such choices, other considerations beyond the rightness and wrongness of the options need to be taken into account. This goes back to what I mentioned at the beginning – preference.  If several choices are acceptable, then there is nothing inherently wrong in following my preference (provided of course that my preferences are guided by the word of God).

But you’ll notice that Paul didn’t do what I’m saying.  While I firmly believe that preference is an acceptable criterion, at least in this situation Paul didn’t follow his preference to depart and be with the Lord.  That leads me to another important factor, which I’ll get into next time.


3 Comments on “Spiritual Decision Making: Good and Right”

  1. Julie Heindselman says:

    I agree but there is one this notable in Paul’s decision in my mind. The option of staying was totally for others benefit in that they would be able to hear the truth and know Jesus. The other option of going was totally for the benefit of Paul. So in choosing to stay he was putting himself last, his service first and those to whom he could witness to in between – JOY – which truly is emulating Jesus. Thus he was doing exactly as you have spoken here about – saving as many souls as possible, becoming more like Jesus, and bringing glory to God.

    So I draw from this example that yes there is more than one good option many times, but what “tips the scale” in the decision making process, at least in this example, is deciding which of the options best helps others while glorifying God. Paul shows us exactly how to be Christ-like which is the ultimate goal for us!

    So I would think after admitting to having a preference to one the choices, the next question would be “Why?” and then determine “Who benefits the most?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s